Home / essay help / college essay service / 16-year-olds to vote

16-year-olds to vote

Introduction:

There is the need to recognize the importance of casting a vote, a right to cast a vote is an important aspect, which should be disused, everybody in the nation or country, should have the same right, there is a need to allow the right to vote to the 16 years old. The government needs to identify the importance of teenagers it should also give the rights, support to the 16 year age, voting age should be lower to 16. The young vote caster in the age of 16 and 17 will cast the meaningful vote. A research shows that government has discussed a lot about it that the young teenagers should be allowed to cast the vote or not, however, there are political issues. The right to cast the vote if given the 16 and 17 years of the teenager, then they would empower and their knowledge will be increased, they can better take the decision, and the habit of casting votes will be developed in them in their formative years. Moreover, the teenagers in 16 years are not mature enough to decide what is good for them; they might follow their parents or the one who influence them that the vote should be given to this person. 

Arguments for:

Argument 1: responsibility

There are many advantages for society and for the 16 and 17 teenagers, if they are allowed to cast the vote, first, that voting right at 16 years old will have significance effect in our culture, the young citizen will be motivated and they will support the government that their government is accommodating and encouraging them. When they know, they are going to cast the vote they should feel the responsibility on their part. They would pay the tax if they realized about the responsibility. It is also matter of equality and fairness when they know they are getting equal rights as others, they will not miss the chance to cast the vote (Fairvote, 2016). 

Argument 2: civic life

The positive impact on the families will take place when there are 16 and 17 years old at the home or households are involved in the civic life. This can turnout their parents and others, of all ages to caste the vote, the early teenagers will influence the family members and people around them. The young voter can also access that who is the right person for them; it can establish the long-life habit, it van makes them sound decision-makers, they needed to be involved with the civic and social matters so their quality participation should be a part of democracy. 

Moreover, youth under the age of 16, pay taxes, follow the rules and regulations defined by Government so they must have some voting rights. A teen under the 16 age almost pays $9.7 billion dollar taxes on sales independently. Most of the children work to get the education and to pay their tuition fee, in addition to this, they are paying taxes to get the education. They have the right to get voting rights (youth rights). 

Argument 3: Aware of polices and society 

Teaching and giving opportunities at the early ages can make them capable enough, to respect their politics, they will take part in the news, they will stay updated with everyday changing in the politics, and they will evolved with the political matters from the 16 and 17 years. Before leaving the school, they will be well aware of polices and society that what needed to be improved or changed. They will be involved with the politics for the later life, the parents and government need to engaged them in voting, the voters will be increased in this way, and right person for the state will be selected by the nation, 16 is the better age to begin with the vote (Davis). When youth will participate, it will generate the much gain from the 16 years of age. It will generate the positive impacts and can capable the voters to decide what is good for them, at the early ages (Vote16sf, 2015). 

Arguments against:

Argument 1: Mental effectiveness

According to the World health organization, the mental effectiveness of the teenagers are not fully developed, they just do, what they are guided to do. They brain of 16 and 17 years of age are not fully mature, there is a need of guidance to them. In the case an of a vote, they should not allow to give the vote due to some reasons (yougov.co). They can wait for two years, after the age of 18 they will be given the right, they may be deprived by the group of people, or someone may influence them to give the vote to this or that party. Anybody can target this age group easily by offering them some things they desired off, they could easily influenced, as they are not fully matured (Berry & Kippin, 2014). 

Argument 2: Not capable to take decisions

The two years of life from the 16 to 18, can make them capable to understand the government, and the civic parties, children of this age group are lazy. They can learn about the government and after this, they will be mature to cast a vote, according to the choice, the children at 16 years are not much competent or capable to take decisions, they are emotional and live in a fantasy world. 

Argument 3: Do not pay attention to the households matters

The two years of life from the 16 to 18, want to change the world; they want to see everything, according to what they desired, they can smart in taking decisions but not as the fully grown adult, like they will be in 18. At the age of 16, they are pressurized by the peer, they even do not pay attention to the households matters, they are not aware of the taxes and property, so how they could decide the political parties and the benefits.

Pros and cons (conclusion):

The children of 16 years of age are not mature enough as they can deprive, people and political parties can take advantage of this age group, they are not capable enough to take the decisions, and they cannot choose what is good and bad for them. However, the early teenage voters can participate with their parents in choosing the best leader, if they are given right to cast votes. On doing this, they will feel responsible and they may try to increase their knowledge regarding political matters, voting right can make them active and involved them in civic life. 

Work Cited

Berry, Richard and Sean Kippin. “Should the UK lower the voting age to 16?” (2014): 1-36.

Davis, Aaron C. 16-year-olds in D.C. could vote for president in 2016, under proposal. 3 November 2015. 3 May 2016 <https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/16-year-olds-in-dc-could-vote-for-president-in-2016-under-proposal/2015/11/03/3175fede-825d-11e5-8ba6-cec48b74b2a7_story.html>.

Fairvote. Lower the Voting Age. 2016. 2 May 2016 <http://www.fairvote.org/lower_the_voting_age#why_should_we_lower_the_voting_age_to_16>.

Vote16sf. 7 reasons why 16 and 17 year olds should vote. Nov 2015. 2 May 2016 <https://vote16sf.wordpress.com/>.

Yougov.co. For and against: Lowering voting age. 26 February 2014. 3 May 2016 <https://yougov.co.uk/news/2012/02/15/and-against-lowering-voting-age/>.

Youthrights. Top ten reasons to lower the voting age. 10 April 2016. May 3 2016 <http://www.youthrights.org/issues/voting-age/top-ten-reasons-to-lower-the-voting-age/>.

About eduhawks

Check Also

agno3 + nacl

AgNO3 + NaCl → AgCl + NaNO3 . How many grams of NaCl would be …