Conflicts between Parents & Children in Arab Society
In context of
Emotional Security Theory by Patrick T. Davies and Cummings EM
The conflicts between the parents and the children in Arab community are recognized through applying the analytical framework of the psychological cognitive theory of emotions proposed by the Patrick T. Davies and the Cummings EM. The psychological behavior in terms of the emotions, feelings, attitudes and the generation gap as per the life cycle or growth stage of the children is interlinked with the family system, core cultural, religious values. The lack of space as per the security theory of emotions in the psychological behavior of the children is analyzed as the marriages or social context setting is impacted by the changes in behaviors that leads towards the conflict between the parents and their children in the Arab community. The system of the family as per the functionalities and the theory of conflicts deeply review in this paper as the changes in the mindset or behaviors such as space must be provided in the decision making of personal as well as professional life (Robert Sedgwick, 2001).
The theory of the emotional security by Patrick T. Davies is the empirical study of the psychological or the emotional behaviors in terms of the physiological patterns in the development of the adulthood with respect to age is analyzed. The gap is studied as a psychological tool with cognitive behavior pattern in the Arab society while identifying the core reasons behind the relationship flaws of the children and their parents. Using the approaches of the constructive conceptual behavior models and the destructive application of the materials as per the psychological adjustment in the changing behavior of the children is analyzed (Davies & Cummings, 2009).
The generation gap is associated with the relationship with the child-parent relationship in Arab community that leads towards the psychological, emotional changes in behaviors in terms of social limitations in the social interaction context on the children relying on traditional socio-cultural behavior patterns. The controlling or the authoritative style from the parents at the pro-social contextual and the role of the emotional security threat that implies to the minds of the children in terms social, psychological or physiological stage of the growth is an important reason.
There is a huge impact on the minds of the children especially in the dimension of the pre-social adoptions of the lifestyle of the children in their growing stage or adolescence. The marriages as per the conflict caused among the parents or the couples, disputes regarding the decision-making of the mutual need fulfillment, sexual desires, the asset management household policies are include in the list of the behavior pattern of the emotional attitudes or feelings that have the very negative impacts on the minds of children especially in the Arab community.
The children are the creature of the God who wants an advantage in terms of the social, cultural context of the physiological decision-makings while learning a lot from the external environment and the sanctions put on the lifestyle of the cultural patterns is the most important issue that must be addressed. The common issues of quarrel among the parental or the couple in the Arab community are mostly related to the social right of spending the life, the practical limitations for the women while doing the job or the employment concerns. The personal issues including the marriages within the family, the decision of birth of child along with family planning inefficiencies are analyzed. The children when found that the situation in which they do not have the ideal scenario to learn from the role models such as the parents, they found the mental stress and the physiological changes in terms of the emotional risks aroused in them. The strategy that the children in terms of the generation gap for the social interactions having the circles with the friends, or the other closed community (Bensi, Giusberti, Raffaella Nori, & Gambetti, 2010).
They profound the changing in terms of the material sources of getting them out of the trouble. The parents usually do not notice or ignore the situation most of the times while arguing or treating the women in the bad way that leads towards the divorce is the common example that is illustrated in this paper at many occasions. The divorce is the major cause of the psychological changing impact as the emotional attitudes or the feelings of the children in the Arab community are related as per the core findings of the emotional security.
There is no as such concept of the independent living style or pattern in terms of the economic trend of lifestyle, the social beliefs, or the way of interaction as a life spending cognitive approach and the living together as a family of a single unit. The family system in the Arab background is include of the pure joint system of the family spending, living pattern or approach, relying on each other on the social, financial state or the elements of the well-being. The Arab cannot imagine living a life an independent state of mindset. They proclaim that the joint venture or the style of the family is beneficial for them in sought of the socio-economic independence while relying on others, as the social prevention of the complexity social framework of reference as the dwellings in the cultural aspects are highlighted according to the compound system of the family rather than living independently (saudiarabia.angloinfo.com, 2011).
The big question arises that the physiological and the psychological subconscious state of the young people in the Arab community is Patrick T. Davies as per the theory of the emotional theory for the security of the feelings in the adulthood as they are in the growing stage is most important to interpret. Since this allows the system of the social gathering as the factor of alienation for lacking the core skills or abilities to do all the private work or tasks in a way that all the closed circle of the family. That would be monitoring as the risk of the element of the psychological sought of the interpersonal manner is examined using the analytical framework.
The qualitative aspects of the emotional attitudes in the behaviors of the human lifestyle especially in the young age, while marinating the challenging behaviors for the child when one perceives the immense level of the difficulty while representing the feelings to the other person in the society. Te theory that linked with the stress of the stress of the emotional feelings as per the rate of the intrapersonal reference and the interpersonal cognition factors that would impact the relationship of the child with the parents especially in the dimensions of the core Arabian society or the community. The distinctive psychological perspective is that the generation gap is highly illustrated in the core dimensions of the psychological depending on the theory of the security in terms of the setting that develop the cultural frame of precise informing about the limitations. This prevails that the children in the Arab society could highly monitor as the foundation of the psychological rights of the threats of social security (Workman, 2014).
The theoretical prospects of the family systems in the Arab community are highlighted as per the joint system as the impact on the lives of the psychopathology through the developmental concerns in the threats of the security treated as the social dimensions. The framework used to study the dimensions of the system of the family in the community of the Arab region is described in a way that the innovative process of the ideal family system is imposed as the proposed solution under such circumstances.
The values that discover the psychological cognitive frame of reference in the social context of the psychological pattern to perceive the system is analyzed. The Patrick Davies highly emphasize on the point that it is very crucial for the parents to represent an ideal psychological scenario in the external model of reference that children would follow. The constructive functional approach works best in the way when the adoptions would occur as the primary psychological need with the perspective of both the parent-child that the generation gap would be removed from the threat or the factor risk as the social security in the minds of the children in the Arab community in an explicit way.
The greatest suggestion that the functional approach of the system of the family in the concurrence rate of the psychological preference of the children social as per the context of the system of the family is the primary goal. The discord between the strong or the sound relationship of the parent with the children is treated as the emotional stage of values that would fifer at many times in the pre-growth life cycle or stage of the growth, the behavioral cognitive factor that would use the core values of the Arab socio-economic dimensions. The processes of the physiological growth in the minds of the children that would consider highly interactive in terms of the conscious settings would occur in this psychopath matrix (Crossman, 2012).
The most important phase in the lifecycle of the parent-children relationship as per the context of the child-parent is that at least the symbolic relationship as per the social interaction that treats as the social interpersonal as the adjustment of the emotional key elements for the concerns of the family adopting the core sound interaction as relationship is maintained. The revolutionary origins that characterizing the conflict resolution theories with the behaviors in the schools, home to the outside environment with community, awareness of the global progressive state of the art in technology with the healthy directions with the parents as per the trajectory that reaches to the highest level of the sequel. The core factor that would rate symbolic interaction with parents as per the psychological challenges for the broader aspect of the social security that would rate as the behavioral proportions in the dilemma attitude that study the guidelines for social behaviors of the Arab children.
The latest strategy as per the psychological regard of the emotional feelings as the threat reducing roots is the development of the objectives that any cost ethological such as following both the use core beliefs of the socio-cultural boundaries that are imposed by the parents. The translation that regards the functioning of the children and the liberty to express oneself as the cognate restructuring of the psychological abilities in the academic or practical compliances is analyzed. This would definitely produce the threat to the cognitive psychological security for the anxiety as well as creating tension in the life of the children.
Strife speculations are viewpoints in human science and social brain science that underline the social, political, or material disparity of a social gathering, that investigate the wide socio-political framework, or that generally take away from support functionalism and ideological conservatism. Struggle hypotheses attract consideration regarding power differential, for example, class strife, and by and large differentiation verifiably overwhelming belief systems. It is consequently a full-scale level examination of society. While a considerable lot of these points of view hold parallels, strife hypothesis does not allude to a brought together school of thought, and ought not to be mistaken for, for incidence, peace, and struggle examine, or some other particular hypothesis of the social class. Karl Marx is the father of the social clash hypothesis, which is a segment of the four ideal models of human science. Certain contention hypothesis set out to highlight the ideological viewpoints inborn in customary thought.
It can be seen that there are many problems in the Arab families. Mostly it can be seen that the parent- children conflict arises due to the conflict on different things that needs to be understood fully. The main point in this paper is that there are conflicts that prevail in between parents and children’s; hence, we can say that the theory, which is in the support with the content, is the conflict theory.
The reason behind that is that the conflict theory itself explains the difference that consists between the two persons that could be any one. However relating to our topic, we can say that the conflict theory relates in between the children’s and the parents as well. There could be many conflicts that arose in between them some of them could be due to the class conflict which arises the mostly. The social conflict also is a part, which is actually seen in between the children’s and the parents in the Arab world. By looking at the above discussion, we can say that the conflict theory supports our content fully.
Generally, the Bedouin lived by raising camels, sheep, and goats and took after their crowds looking for touching ranges. Just 5 percent of Bedouin still live as peaceful migrants; the rest of settled in towns and towns Starting in the last third of the twentieth century, peaceful itinerant turned out to be progressively uncommon due to country states with shut outskirts and the quick urbanization of the area’s populaces. Subsequently, the Bedouin have turned out to be progressively stationary.
The Bedouin family, as other Arab families, is moored in a culture-bound financial and political system. The biggest unit in the Bedouin system is the Qabilah, or country, comprising of a few tribes (ashira, plural ashir) each with its own particular land and pioneer. A matrilineal family relationship structure of a few eras includes a wide system of blood relations plunged through the male line. Previously, the hamula gave its individuals, who lived and meandered together and shared land and work, with monetary security and insurance. The tribe is a union of more distant families, or hamula (plural hamail). The hamula constitutes the momentous family. With the loss of the Bedouin’s predictable employments, the hamula is less ready to satisfy these capacities. Regardless it serves, in any case, as significant wellspring of personality and psychosocial backing and economic good. The atomic family, hamula, and tribe are steadfastly bound by broad common duties and commitments. The atomic group of guardians and kids is the littlest family.
This interpersonal organization is supported and kept up by a profoundly imbued arrangement of qualities and desires that oversee the conduct and the connections of the individuals. People are relied upon to show unreliability and obligation to the group, to place its great over their own, and to take after the guidelines and charges of those above them in the chain of importance. The key qualities are agreeableness, connection camaraderie, and order. The Bedouin nervous tension participation, adjustment, settlement, and family attachment is analyzed.
Arab Family System
The way of life of the Arab world is profoundly commanded by center Muslim esteem frameworks, for example, respect, duty, feeling, confront sparing and a few other definitive practices. It is attention to be the coupling power and is considered critical in all the social and financial exercises. The three examples of society in the Arab culture integrate the Bedouin tribes and individuals living in the provincial and urban ranges. The family is thought to be the essential unit of social union in the conventional and old Arab society. Solidarity and unity is an essential part of the Arab culture as every one of the individuals coordinate concordantly to secure its vocation and enhance to enhance its notoriety in the group. The realization or disappointment of an individual part turns into that of the family overall.
The sentiment congruity and harmony is exceedingly up and coming amongst the families. This is because of the way that family association gives high level of security. The idea of monetary commonality in the families in the Arab culture is under genuine risk by different schools of musings and other social foundations in the innovative world. Bedouins demonstrate awesome respect and high level of dependability toward their families. The family unit emotionally supportive network is thought to be amazingly occupant and it is esteemed as the individual’s definitive asylum.
This prompts the making of turmoil as it obliterates the distinction of individuals living in the group. This perspective gives security on one hand furthermore prompts strife for the people then again. There might be the times when the people feel that they have distinctive thoughts, which are not in friendship with that of gathering.
The father is the key figure in the family framework and he appreciates incredible self-sufficiency over the whole family. The state of mind of father may get unbending grim, stern, and to a great degree definitive, though the mother is wonderfully adoring and merciful. Bedouins take a gander at life personalized. They are worried about individuals and sentiments and place accentuation on human variables when they settle on choices towards individuals. This is to a great degree inimitable in the way of life of Arab world in overwhelmingly all the Arab nations.
The Arab family might be depicted as the essential unit of generation and the focal point of Arab social association and financial exercises. The Arab Family as a Central Socioeconomic Unit The customary Arab family constitutes a monetary and social unit since all individuals collaborate to guarantee its maintenance and enhance its remaining in the group. Endeavors, for example, shops, industrial facilities, organizations, and fields are regularly claimed and worked for the advantage of all. It developed into a patriarchal, pyramidal various level (especially as for sex and age), and amplified foundation. Give us a chance to take a gander at each of these qualities thusly. As of not long ago, when the state started to give administrations to its natives, the family attempted such varied undertakings and duties as instruction, socialization, preparing, protection, welfare, job, and religious childhood.
The family is at the focal point of social association in each of the three Arab examples of living (Bedouin, provincial, and urban) and especially among tribes, laborers, and the urban poor. It additionally gives security and backing in times of individual and societal push. The achievement or disappointment of an personality part turns into that of the family all in all. Each individual from the family might be considered in charge of the demonstrations of each other part. The family constitute the prevailing social establishment through which people and gatherings acquire their religious, class, and social affiliations. The sexual trouble making of a young lady, for instance, reflects upon herself as fit as upon her dad, her sibling, and her family in general.
In this way the “wrongdoing of respect,” which now and again still happens in firmly weave groups, is an endeavor to reestablish the family’s respect and place in the group by executing a sister or little girl who has been eminent in sexual unfortunate behavior. Guardians, and especially the mother, deny themselves for their youngsters. The wellspring of the mother’s satisfaction is the joy and flourishing of her youngsters. One’s dedication to the family may include widespread abstinence. In a just right world, both kids and guardians are completely dedicated to the family itself. The very idea of family in Arabic ( ‘aila or usra ) reflects such shared odd jobs and connections of association and correspondence.
The foundation of the word ‘aila furthermore of usra signifies “to bolster.” While the father’s part is characterized as that of supplier ( janna ) and the mother’s part as that of homemaker ( banna ), kids change from being ‘iyal (wards) to sanadi (supporters) once their folks achieve seniority. This symbolizes the dropping of one’s individual character and appropriation rather than the personality or part of parenthood or parenthood. This clarifies why guardians in a few sections of the Arab world may allude to a tyke as sanadi (my backing). Another outflow of the dedication and restraint of guardians is the convention in the eastern Arab universe of getting to be known as “Abu,” father of, or “Umm,” mother of, one’s eldest child. A tape sent by a young fellow from a Syrian town to his dad and mom, who were on a two-month visit to their higher-ranking two children contemplate in the United States, reveals extensive insight into the inward progression of Arab employee families.
There are the diverse systems used by these procedures have added to the ascent of another circumstance whereby the old and the new exist one next to the other. It has altered the structure, capacity and part of marriage. In will of the fact that we cannot say that patriarchal family in Gulf society has vanished as far as preceded with male power and control over family issues, This new circumstance has escalated existing social issues and made new ones. It has brought on changes in the structures and elements of social establishments, most remarkably the 12 family. we can in any case watch a few markers that mean constriction and withdraw in patriarchal family structures.
Emphasize that adjustments in Gulf family structure and capacities were not exclusively brought about by the strengths and procedures of globalization. Some of these weights are section of Gulf ladies into the work market; ladies’ support in numerous exercises and regions that were not passable before; the changing spouse wife relationship; change in the relationship of guardians with their youngsters. the way youth identify with society; Nevertheless, these strengths and procedures have expanded and strengthened these weights, overall. the expanding financial, instructive and social weight of bringing up kids; the debilitating of customary techniques and method for socialization. Globalized correspondences play an imperative and compelling part in today’s socialization of kids and youth.
The mother or grandma is no more the principle operator of bringing up kids or of managing them. Issues relating to socialization no more appear as qualities and background got from grown-ups (senior people) or starting grown-ups’ supply of experience. These sources are a portion of the section doors to social stereotyping made by globalization. Propels in method for communication, which are an item and instrument of globalization, to be had ascend to new factors and standards are dictated by the new culture of globalization. Such values and information are gotten from books, TV, telephone system and the Internet.
Despite the fact that we don’t have exact and clear information on, for instance, the marriage cases that occur through web visiting, we do realize that numerous relational unions in the Gulf area occurred as an aftereffect of bracket together over settled or cell phone lines. In addition, despite the fact that we have no precise experimental information on the element of cell phones in the ascent of marriage rates, some daily paper reports allude to the way that cell phones have encouraged contacts among youth of both gender outside family and societal control. The simplicity by which an individual can claim a cell phone line, men and ladies alike, even among the most conservative gatherings and groups helped people defeat the boundaries of separation and isolation forced by society and the family on the relationship of men and ladies in Gulf social orders.
In addition, travel and touristic trips opened the entryway for sex-tourism to Gulf people who go to some East Asian nations, and to different nations for this reason. The thriving and development of business shopping centers gave the chance to guys and females to meet. A great deal of dating happens in coffeehouses and stores situated in advanced selling shopping centers. Travel and sightseeing additionally offer ascent to instances of blended relational unions or outside relational unions finished up by people and females from the Gulf area
They have hormones dashing around inside, which abandons them stuck on a passionate indirect. They are finding their identity and experimenting with assorted personalities, which imply they can be unruly and challenge your power. Amid pre-adulthood, young people feel pulled in a hundred unique headings by every one of the progressions that are occurring in and around them. Their body is changing, which can make them undergo cumbersome and humiliated. Being acknowledged by their associates goes up against significantly more noteworthy significance, which implies they may instigate acting or carrying on in an unexpected way.
Regardless they need to satisfy their folks (trust it or not!), which can appear inconsistent with everything else that is continuing for them. Being a parent in a multicultural society like Australia can be exceptionally testing, especially if group values about how kids ought to be raised and how they ought to act are not quite the same as your own. They feel under weight to do well at school or locate the right occupation, which can make them on edge and questionable. They are trying their freedom and figuring out how to settle on choices for themselves, which implies they will require your backing and direction.
Obviously, there are numerous advantages to raising kids in a various group – they can be instructed to be glad for their legacy and still figure out how to esteem and value the distinctions in alternate societies around them. In any case, as your tyke achieves immaturity, and begins investing more energy far from the family, it’s basic for strains to erupt For example, at home youngsters may be relied upon to obey rules without question. However, outside the home, it is not ill bred for youngsters to have their own particular perspectives and to communicate. . Your adolescent may explore different avenues regarding new thoughts and ways to deal with perceive how they ‘fit’. They may begin to scrutinize your social and religious qualities.
It is unavoidable that there will be times when you and your adolescent bolt horns. Some of the time, the explanation behind this comes down to a conflict of societies and qualities. Whatever the reason, it is essential to attempt and work towards determining your disparities. Adhering unbendingly to your thoughts could imply that your tyke moves in the opposite direction of you. Now and then it is because of your youngster is growing up. Then again, young people who have a decent association with no less than one parent are less inclined to get into genuine inconvenience. There are frequently no “privilege” or “wrong” responses to taking care of an issue. Alternatively, maybe, it’s critical to take an ideal opportunity to listen to your youngster and comprehend what they’re stating, regardless of the possibility that you don’t concur with them.
In case you are having, genuine clash hold a family meeting and permit everybody to talk straightforwardly and sincerely. search for an assortment of conceivable arrangements ask a regarded relative or group part to take a seat and chat with the family look for help and counsel from somebody in your group who you trust create fellowships with different guardians in your group – the backing of a ‘more distant family’ can be essential. Different guardians may have the same battles.
Guardians who have solid associations with their youngsters are frequently in a decent position to manage issues that surface. Here are some approaches to fabricate trust and regard with your adolescent.
- Be positive and empowering – see the great things they do.
- Respect your kid’s security.
- Get to know them and the things they are keen on.
- Be accessible for them.
- Do not be hesitant to say sorry on the off chance that you have committed an error.
- Learn to joke and mess around with each other.
- Show them that you give it a second thought
They truly do need to realize that you adore them and will be there for them! Not adapting in spite of the fact that it is ordinary for young people to have times when they are grouchy, bad tempered and defiant; furthermore, recollect no issue is excessively shocking or humiliating, making it impossible to discuss it. This does not imply that guardians ought to endure unsatisfactory conduct, particularly on the off chance that it grows into physical savagery. You may achieve a phase when you require outside offer assistance. Numerous individuals and associations can offer secret help and backing.
Distinctive dialects pass on various renditions of reality. To handle what individuals think about, for instance, the expression “compromise,” we should first discover what they mean by the comparable idea in their own dialect. In the event that compromise suggests in their dialect the substitution of disdain by affection, then diverse direct will be fitting than if it essentially implies reestablishing the routine of everyday life. Obviously, what the heroes really do in a given circumstance relies on upon conditions; what they will expect of compromise will be educated by the neighborhood learning that illuminates their comprehension of the term. however, we would expect clear examples of conduct to rise in total. By looking into the semantic fields and meanings of ideas like “clash” and “determination” in different dialects, we can reveal insight into likenesses and contrasts (Arévalo-Flechas, 2014).
At a down to earth level, this can recognize potential pitfalls and openings, in actuality, struggle determination crosswise over societies. Most of the writing takes a gander at the subject nonexclusively, which implies that regular basic elements of contention determination that cut crosswise over societies are underscored. As a rule, the presumption of all inclusiveness is certain. P.H. Gulliver unequivocally thoroughly analyzes the transaction of debate in various societies to uncover the hidden and invariant rationale of the procedure. Huge advance has been made in late decades in the investigation of contention determination, and a voluminous group of work has been delivered that would be difficult to compress briefly. His purpose of flight is “the speculation that there are normal examples and regularities of communication between the gatherings in arrangement, regardless of the specific setting or the issues in debate.”
This approach appears to be supported in the main occasion in light of the fact that the significant classes of contention determination in English-transaction, settling, intervention, and mediation have all the earmarks of being widespread and share family similitude’s. Gulliver’s speculation on the suspicion of all inclusiveness has paid off liberally at both the hypothetical and connected levels. Additionally, at the establishment of a teaching it is proper to build up a common calculated structure, regardless of the fact that this implies briefly putting aside abnormalities. It has conveyed us to the point where there is a set up train and generous accord at any rate in a great part of the English-talking world (Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States)- about the utility of integrative dealing and elective (or fitting) question determination (ADR) methods (Edmonds, 2015).
Morals aside, there is developing acknowledgment that contradictions are occasionally took care of viably by a distraction with relative pick up to others’ detriment, thoughtless uncompromising nature, or savagery. Where fundamental, the aptitudes of prepared outsiders are drawn upon. No one is considered to have a syndication of truth and equity, and results are looked for that neither leave triumphalism champions nor upset failures. The critical thinking way to deal with struggle determination keeps up those genuine needs instead of strategic positions ought to be tended to, and innovativeness and practicality connected to the settlement of contrasts. As Jeffrey Rubin aptly put it: “As opposed to view transaction as a pull of war in which each of two sides endeavors to surrender as meager of its goals as could be expected under the circumstances, the common increases approach sees arrangement as a bewilder to be understood.”
It is a declaration to the accomplishment of Gulliver’s theory that we can now certainly relax the presumption of comprehensiveness and concentrate on more socially particular components of contention determination. As social orders become progressively multicultural and globalization prompts a blossoming of contacts crosswise over social orders, contrasts turn out to be more remarkable. Incidentally, the more the worldwide framework looks like a worldwide group, the more open door there is for scraped spot. Contact advances understanding, as well as conflict. There is a justifiable reason explanation behind this change in accentuation from purposes of similarity to varieties crosswise over societies. For whatever length of time that the onus is on struggle determination inside sensibly homogenous social orders, or inside groups commanded by a hegemonic culture, there is no squeezing need to examine assortment (Hergenhahn, 2013).
The expression “sulha” gets from the Arabic word Sulh. The dynamic idea of peace is Salaam; however, the exacting demonstration of ceasing strife and subsiding into peace is Sulh. The word can likewise signify “compromise,” “collaboration” or “pardoning.”
The standards of sulha are “installed in tribal culture and in intelligence and experience went down from era to era.” Much of the writing on the procedure is set with regards to physical ambush conferred by an individual from one family or tribe against an individual from another, and the least demanding approach to comprehend the wide standards of sulha is to set the clarification in that theoretical connection: An assault by one relative against an individual from an alternate family. Sulha emerged to react to the need to reestablish arrange between families, tribes or towns so that fights and quarrels don’t debilitate the steadiness of the bigger community.
This statute, nevertheless, may subject the group to savagery in its middle for a long time, as retribution sustains dependable quarrels. Keeping in mind the end goal to counteract such brokenness, the custom of sulha is summoned. By custom, a family has the privilege, as well as the commitment to exact retribution an assault on one of its individuals. “To retaliate for the murder of a nearby brother is decent; to neglect to do as such is shameful.”
Instantly upon the assault having happened, the group of the aggressor approaches one or even more exceedingly regarded, persuasive individuals, soliciting that they intercede for benefit from the gathering. Certain expressions of supplication are generally utilized, begging the jaha to accept the accountability. Among them may be “We are in your home and you should help us .Our child has perpetrated a wrongdoing and our family is in your grasp.” These interveners are alluded to overall as the jaha. There is no supporting of the certainties or of the family’s obligation. The deed is admitted and the jaha is requested that follow up on that premise. The assailant’s family should actually ask the jaha to go up against the matter; generally, when they do visit the oppressed family it will not have the capacity to convey the power required.
The interactions in the symbolic direction that would support the relationship in the mutual consent or agreement between the parents along with their children in a way that the exposure would decrease in the form of risk as social or emotional challenging behavior of the children in the community of Arab regions is monitored. The wide array of the impairments is accomplished from the depression level as the cognitive psychological significant challenges in the inter-parental interaction that would highlight the physiological inter-parental factors of well being socially, financially, hospitality and health. The significant level of problems that exist between the family as the development stage of the child is raise while organizing the core dimensional issues for the settings that would treat as the extra-familial guidelines in the exposure of the families regularities that are deliberately forced onto the behaviors of the young people in the Arab families (Hergenhahn, 2013).
Looking at the theory by Patrick T. Davis the emotional security theory we come to know that children’s are main point of focus in this. We can see that the children’s mainly are looking for the higher goals in their lives and we can see that they want to be safe and want to secure their family in this regard. However, it can be seen that marital conflicts have been classified in to two categories, which are constructive and destructive in nature. We can see that marital conflicts actually threaten in the different way as that is not one of the best things that can be seen.
However, it can be seen that the parents actually maintain their children’s security in this case so that they feel comfortable with that. The parents are always in the need to maintain the harmony of the family so that children will not get disturbed and the flow could be maintained as well. Therefore, these symbolic interaction theries actually supports the conflicts. We can see that the conflict theory does align with this as we come to know this is the main point on which the different theories evolve.
In the end, it is concluded that the main reason behind the conflict of the relationship between the parents with their children in the Arab community is the psychological cognitive emotions, feelings, non-flexibility in the family system in this culture as according to the social security theory proposed from the Patrick and Cummins. The most important theory that plays the role in this manner is the conflict theory which defines the complexities in the interaction with the peers, adaptations to the behaviors with reference to the external environment in a way that the balance and the sustainable relationship for parent-child is highly maintain. With the effort that encourages the psychological trajectories for the inter-parental as the translation of the discord could achieve through certain issues are necessary in this regard. The family system in the Arab community demands the children must possess the cultural beliefs, core norms that bind them towards the cultural limitations in the development of lifecycle. The relationship is analyzed using the psychological patterns of the conflict challenges as they raise because of the material social approach of the adjustments in the behaviors while the investigation is analytically composed of the positive outcomes and the negative outcomes of the applying the social-emotional security theory in the context of the Arab community. The meanderings are found in the cross mixing or amalgamation of the various western cultures comprised of the technological advancements or the social liberty of the children and the other side where the restrictions are made on the children according to the social interactions or technological use of the resources or tools (Arévalo-Flechas, 2014).
Arévalo-Flechas, L. C. (2014). Latino Alzheimer’s caregivers: what is important to them? Journal of Managerial Psychology , 29 (6), 661-684.
Bensi, L., Giusberti, F., Raffaella Nori, R., & Gambetti, E. (2010). Individual differences and reasoning: A study on personality traits. British Journal of Psychology , 101 (3), 545-562.
Crossman, A. (2012). Charles Horton Cooley. Retrieved april 20, 2015, from http://sociology.about.com/od/Profiles/p/Charles-Horton-Cooley.htm
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (2009). Constructive and destructive marital conflict, emotional security and children’s prosocial behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry , 50 (3), 270–279.
Davis, D. (2003). Auguste Comte: Theories & Contributions to Sociology. Retrieved april 20, 2015, from http://study.com/academy/lesson/auguste-comte-theories-contributions-to-sociology.html
Edmonds, L. (2015, january 6). The Seasons of Life. Retrieved May 6, 2015, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201501/the-seasons-life?collection=167224
Hergenhahn, B. R. (2013). An Introduction to the History of Psychology. Cengage Learning.
Robert Sedgwick. (2001, november 1). Education in Saudi Arabia. Retrieved october 12, 2015, from http://wenr.wes.org/2001/11/wenr-nov-dec-2001-education-in-saudi-arabia/
saudiarabia.angloinfo.com. (2011). The School System in Saudi Arabia. Retrieved october 12, 2015, from http://saudiarabia.angloinfo.com/family/schooling-education/the-school-system/
SmileySammy. (2011, may 7). Positive and Negative Deviance. Retrieved april 20, 2015, from http://haassociology32444.blogspot.com/2011/05/positive-and-negative-deviance.html
Workman, L. (2014). Evolutionary Psychology. Cambridge University Press.