The experience is true because it is based upon the ways as initiated by the feminist. The social-science perspective ideally relates to pornography because it is suggested as a big platform to introduce the high-hostile aspect in detail. The experiments have introduced the rape-prone mindset mostly in men rather women. The increased levels of aggression are necessary to produce according to my experience when a man faces certain types of pornography perspective.
The increased levels self-reported mode in the male platform is trickier indeed in such way that is recommended with normal groups. The intention of such way described by the writer was proved with the nationwide boycott of Deep Throat film in 1980. It proved that college-aged males are more open towards rape cases rather the female part of the society. The adult books and videos stores are also there and have large customer basis because the same percentage as explored by the author proved the visitors ratio as well.
The openness of the intention of males according to given percentage as suggested by the author cannot address issues in social class, community class and most important at racial class. The desire towards these acts was high from the time when the Pornography included in the pleasure perspective at law level. The law was not present at that time when there was aggression about activities listed in college-age males as it shown in differentiation strategy. The Civil-rights Ant pornography Ordinance is the only solution according to my perspective so that there should be rift between different activities most importantly activities of adult nature. The less expose towards adult content whether a college student or not, can enhance the nature of experiences with adult content and automatically it can negate the voice of rape mindsets in society.